06 — Map-Pack Visibility
Where they actually show up on Google Maps
We ran our own 5×5 ranking grid (5-mile radius) around every one of their 123 locations for the search “swim school” (hand-picked) on 2026-07-09 — 3,075 live Google Maps rank checks.
8.5%
brand-wide Share of Local Voice for “swim school” — the share of all 3,075 measured points where a location ranked in the top 3
1 of 123 locations never appeared in the map pack anywhere on their grid. Median location SoLV: 8.3%.
How often the brand appears at a measured point
Top 20 (found at all)8.6%
Locations by map-pack visibility
Real ranking grids
Each cell is one live rank check on the grid around the location — the number is the actual Google Maps position at that point.
Strongest market
Montgomery, AL
35.3% map-pack share on this grid
Weakest market
Troy, MI
0% map-pack share on this grid
Rank 1–3 (map pack)Rank 4–10Rank 11–20Not in the top 20 resultsNo map results at this point (excluded)
Strongest markets — “swim school” (map-pack share)
Zero & weakest markets — “swim school”
1 of 123 locations never appear in the map pack anywhere on their grid for “swim school” — 0% share.
Weakest markets that still have some visibility:
Goldfish Swim School – Astoria (NY)4%
Keyword comparison — separate full grid sweeps
For each row we ran that exact search on Google Maps thousands of times — from different neighborhoods around every single location — and counted how often the brand showed up in the top 3. “At zero” = share of locations that never appeared in the top 3 anywhere in their area.
Search termSourceBrand SoLVInvisible locsSearches run
“swim school”hand-picked8.5%0.8% at zero3,075 searches
“swim lessons”hand-picked8%0.8% at zero3,075 searches
“sports school”auto-derived from their GBP category2.8%33.3% at zero3,075 searches
Regional breakdown — “swim school”
A OH location is, on average, 1.2× more visible on the map than one in NY.
Reviews aren’t what’s holding these locations back. Across the 122 locations with a Google rating, ratings sit between 4.3 and 5.0 stars — and the locations with the most reviews rank no better on the map than the ones with the fewest. The visibility gap comes from somewhere else, which means it can be fixed without waiting on more reviews.
StateMap-pack shareLocationsAvg reviewsAvg rating
OH8.9%15 locations209 reviews4.74 ★ FL8.8%8 locations239 reviews4.80 ★ IL8.6%15 locations198 reviews4.73 ★ MI8.6%13 locations248 reviews4.84 ★ MD8.3%8 locations237 reviews4.64 ★ NJ8.2%11 locations345 reviews4.79 ★ NC8.2%6 locations206 reviews4.77 ★ TX7.4%11 locations214 reviews4.75 ★ NY7.2%7 locations161 reviews4.54 ★ States with at least 5 scanned locations. Map-pack share averages the per-location results shown above — same grid scan, same search term (“swim school”). Statistical check: correlation between a location’s map-pack share and its review count is -0.08 (122 locations), and -0.04 against its star rating (122 locations); values near zero mean no relationship.
Method: DataForSEO Google Maps rank checks, 5×5 points per location at 5-mile radius, top-20 depth, matched by Google place ID. Share of Local Voice (SoLV) = the share of pack-bearing points where the location appears in the top 3 (“map pack”) results. 3,075 points measured across 123 locations on 2026-07-09. At 196 points Google returned no map results at all for this search — there is no pack to win there, so those points are excluded from every SoLV denominator (disclosed, never counted as a miss). Nothing on this panel is modeled or estimated.